9 factors to consider when choosing a mobile platform
Going cross-platform, staying native or going cross-platform while staying native? Sounds terrifying enough even for those who get the hint of what this all is about. Hard to imagine what chaos it can create in the mind of someone who simply wants to develop a neat mobile application.
Engaged in both native and cross-platform mobile development, ScienceSoft did its best to unscramble the logic behind the process of choosing the best mobile development platform for you application. To determine the pros and cons of native development and cross-platform tools such as Cordova, Xamarin.Forms or Xamarin.iOS/.Android, we considered the 9 most influential factors.
1. Platform-specific UI, high FPS
No matter how excellent cross-platform development may get in imitating nativity, it’s still not native to the core. Only 100% Android/iOS/Windows Phone apps have the highest FPS rate and platform-unique interface. However, developing separate UIs for iOS and Android in corresponding Xamarins is a good way to improve user experience.
2. Video/audio processing
Video/audio channels are probably the most whimsical features of any mobile app. To be on the safe side and make sure that apps will show their best behavior, you should choose either native or Xamarin.iOS/.Android mobile platform development.
3. Access to specific hardware
While it sure isn’t a problem for a native application, for a cross-platform one it is a major challenge to get in contact with the platform specific hardware. However, Xamarin has overcome it: app developed with Xamarin.Forms or Xamarin.iOS/Android easily connect to the hardware of any device.
4. Advanced network access
As you may have already noticed in the infographics, Xamarin is pretty successful at catching up with native development in many aspects and presents a solid competition to it. Thanks to this framework’s powerful libraries and the out-of-browser operating principle – in contrast to Cordova – Xamarin applications have no network access limitations.
5. Integration with maps
Maps involve both image processing and connection to GPS. So, only a framework that grants relevantly high frames-per-second rate and easy hardware access can create such application. Judging from our experience in Xamarin development, we are confident that this framework is as suitable for creating applications with perfect maps integration as native development tools.
6. High Performance
In the context of cross-platform development, any application’s performance is driven by its basic operating principle. Cordova application, which operates within its own invisible browser, has a great number of limitations and will hardly be capable to support any intricacies, whereas Xamarin helps to develop applications with near-native functionality.
7. Integration with ERP, CRM
If your major requirement for an application is the ability to integrate with ERP or CRM, then your options are not limited. In fact, you shouldn’t be worried at all: easy integration with business tools is guaranteed for all mobile application development platforms.
8. Cost saving
We always pay more for more power and possibilities. Since Cordova presents a browser wrapper, it is best suited for development of simple applications, and, being open-source, is your cheapest option. With Xamarin, on the other hand, you have more freedom.. and a mandatory license fee. Moreover, if you want to tailor the UI to iOS and Android with Xamarin, the costs will rise even higher due to the need to test a bigger chunk of code. But naturally, separate development of native applications for all the three platforms will cost you the most.
9. Long-term investment protection
Android, iOS and Windows Phone will most likely be out there forever, so with them there's a 0% risk for long-term investment. Cordova is officially supported by SAP and the open-source community, which gives you the feel of confidence in the future, as well. Previously, when Xamarin was a standalone company, developing an app with it was more of a gamble. But now, when the company is backed by Microsoft, it is a solid investment.
From all what we have seen, it’s clear that the choice of the mobile application development method depends on the compilation of factors rather than on one or two of them. In order not to take risks, a good decision is to turn to professional developers. Offering mobile consulting services, ScienceSoft specialists have a keen eye and are able to advice the development option that your application will benefit from the most.