EHR for General Surgery

The process begins with an in-depth review of current surgical workflows. Business analysts and healthcare consultants work closely with surgeons, anesthesiologists, perioperative nurses, infection prevention specialists, and administrators to identify where existing systems fall short. Their input shapes the functional and non-functional requirements that describe what the new system must deliver: from structured surgical records and ERAS order sets to integration with lab, imaging, and pharmacy networks.

Compliance specialists examine regulatory obligations such as HIPAA, ONC certification criteria, DEA requirements for EPCS, and quality reporting standards like NHSN OPC and ACS NSQIP. In parallel, data migration specialists plan strategies for moving surgical notes, implant logs, preference card templates, and scheduling data from legacy systems to the new environment. The project team then creates a roadmap that outlines development milestones, integration priorities, budget estimates, and KPIs such as ERAS adherence and completeness of surveillance data.

Learn how ScienceSoft incorporates compliance into every stage of healthcare software development.

Architects translate requirements into an overall system structure. At this stage, the team decides which quality attributes to prioritize. For a surgical EHR, scalability to handle high data volumes, reliability during peak usage, and cost-efficient cloud deployment are common focal points. The next step is to decompose the EHR into logical and functional modules. Architects define how these modules interact with each other and with external systems and prepare data flow diagrams that specify APIs, data formats, and communication protocols. In parallel, engineers compare frameworks and databases for performance and maintainability, assess licensing costs, and consider future scalability. The final choices are documented, along with a deployment strategy and a failover plan.

Learn how ScienceSoft ensures standards-based interoperability in healthcare software.

UX and UI designers define role-specific user journeys: how a surgeon documents an operative note, how a nurse verifies consent forms, or how an infection preventionist extracts OPC data. This helps them connect software functions with real surgical tasks. Next, they create wireframes and UI prototypes, which are validated in real surgical scenarios to ensure usability in high-pressure settings.

Designers focus on making administrative processes clear, fast, and foolproof. For example, operative note headers can pre-fill with the planned procedure, side, and mapped NHSN category, while ASA and wound class appear as suggested values from linked assessments. ERAS order sets can load with contextual defaults (multimodal analgesia, antiemetics, and VTE prophylaxis aligned to the procedure type), so clinicians start from a safe baseline instead of an empty form.

Learn how ScienceSoft builds user convenience into healthcare UX design.

EHR development typically follows a different rhythm than consumer or enterprise software. Because regulatory requirements and clinical workflows are clearly defined, the scope of features stabilizes early. Instead of delivering minor updates every few weeks, engineering teams focus on producing a validated MVP and then evolving the system through less frequent, carefully planned releases. Any changes that touch order management, data integrity, or reporting workflows formal change control review led by technical, clinical, and compliance stakeholders to preserve regulatory alignment and prevent disruption to established surgical processes.

For a surgical EHR, the MVP typically includes the patient record module with structured surgical data, core charting and note templates, ERAS-based order sets, implant log with UDI capture, and basic integrations with LIS, RIS, PACS, and pharmacy networks. Once the core is stable, engineers extend functionality through clinically meaningful increments. Later releases may add compliance and quality reporting templates (SOR, C-CDA, OPC forms), operational analytics and outcome dashboards, device recall response, and patient engagement modules (portal, telemedicine, mobile adherence tools). Each increment is validated against measurable acceptance criteria (e.g., verifying that device recall alerts appear in implant logs within defined timeframes).

Right before deployment, compliance specialists conduct internal audits to verify adherence to HIPAA or GDPR, and other necessary regulations. They also review and update relevant documentation to ensure all regulatory deliverables (e.g., validation evidence for ONC or FDA-relevant modules) are up to date and aligned with the latest guidelines. Data migration specialists extract, transform, and load surgical data from legacy systems into the new EHR.

To ensure users adopt the system smoothly, the development team prepares a full set of knowledge-transfer materials. This typically includes a user guide, system administration manual, maintenance and support guide, and integration handbook that explains interfaces with LIS, RIS, PACS, ERP, and registries. Training sessions are conducted for each role group: surgeons rehearse operative note completion, nurses practice consent and safety checklist workflows, infection preventionists walk through data extraction for NHSN, and administrators learn to configure templates. At ScienceSoft, we typically split training into two groups. The early adopters help us uncover and fix hidden issues and refine user manuals. Later, they can coach their peers to speed up the large-scale adoption.

Learn how ScienceSoft treats knowledge transfer and user training in healthcare IT projects.

Deployment can also go in waves rather than all at once. It may start with one hospital service line, such as general abdominal surgery, then expand once the core workflows prove stable. Implementation teams provide round-the-clock support during go-live, monitoring adoption, and collecting user feedback. Post-deployment, outcome dashboards, quality reporting feeds, and integration flows are closely observed to ensure data accuracy. Continuous monitoring extends to regulatory changes and evolving standards, allowing the system to stay aligned with updates in NHSN mapping, ONC certification rules, or device recall processes.